Ghostwriting the Law
News: A
little-known corporate lobby is drafting business-friendly bills for state
legislators across the country.
By Karen
Olsson
September/October
2002 Issue
On August 7,
thousands of state legislators and corporate lobbyists were scheduled to
descend on Orlando, Florida, for the annual meeting of the American Legislative
Exchange Council, or ALEC. There, they could play golf, listen to speeches by
Secretary of Education Rod Paige and Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao, and attend
the Thomas Jefferson Freedom Award Banquet, raising a glass to limited
government. Those able to resist the lure of Epcot and Gatorland could also
attend sessions on "free market" reforms designed to minimize
government's role in health care and curb lawsuits by consumers. And all the
while, state representatives and business lobbyists would engage in what ALEC
calls an "exchange of ideas" about public policy.
But that exchange didn't end when
the conferees returned to their home states. With more than 2,400 state
lawmakers as members -- roughly one third of the nation's total -- ALEC is a
year-round clearinghouse for business-friendly legislation. Its nine task
forces, each composed of legislators and representatives from private industry,
sit down together to draft model bills on issues ranging from agriculture to
school vouchers, which are then introduced in state legislatures across the
country.
Not surprisingly,
many of the bills benefit the companies that helped write them. Consider ALEC's "Environmental Audit Privilege," a
measure that relieves companies of legal responsibility for their own
pollution. The bill got its start in 1992, when Colorado regulators fined the
Coors Brewing Company for smog-inducing air emissions at several plants. ALEC
was quick to respond, drafting a measure to prevent firms from being fined if
they report environmental violations at their facilities, and to keep such
disclosures secret. Coors is a corporate member of ALEC, and company executive
Allan Auger is a past chairman of the group, to which the Coors family's Castle
Rock Foundation is also a donor. Last year, Kentucky and Oregon passed
audit-privilege laws like the one drawn up by ALEC.
In another instance of
profitable policymaking, ALEC drafted a model "truth in sentencing"
bill that restricts parole eligibility for prisoners, keeping inmates locked up
longer. One of the members of the task force that drafted
the bill was Corrections Corporation of America, the nation's largest private
prison company, which stands to cash in on longer sentences. By the
late 1990s, similar sentencing measures had passed in 40 states. "There
was never any mention that ALEC or anybody else had any involvement in
this," Walter Dickey, the former head of Wisconsin's prison system, told
reporters after his state passed a version of the measure.
Other corporate-friendly bills
drafted by ALEC would require state governments to deregulate electric
utilities, repeal minimum-wage laws, limit class-action lawsuits against
companies, privatize public pensions, and compensate property owners for
environmental regulations that restrict land use. The Electronic Government
Securities Act, an ALEC-drafted bill being considered in seven states, would
limit state governments from providing Internet services that compete with the
private sector.
Many lawmakers welcome the
chance to draft such legislation with corporate executives. "It gives you
an opportunity to sit down at the same table with all of the companies in the
private sector and discuss issues that affect the public," says Bill
Carter, a Republican state representative in Texas who has belonged to the
organization for more than a decade. "It's very helpful."
But critics charge that the
group allows corporations to write public policy in secret. "Where we have
trouble with ALEC is the fact that it operates in a very behind-the-scenes
fashion," says Brad DeVries of the nonprofit Defenders of Wildlife.
"It brings together some of the most powerful corporate interests to sit
down and write legislation, which is then offered around the country without
their fingerprints on it."
Indeed, lawmakers sometimes
have no idea that they are voting on bills that have been drafted by industry.
Fred Bosse, a Democrat in the Texas House, says he discovered ALEC's
pro-business bias when he attended one of the group's conferences. "I saw
that one of the talks was on the greenhouse effect, which was one of the issues
I've always been interested in," he recalls. "There was this
professor from someplace, and the theme of his talk was that the greenhouse
effect is nothing but a scam being advanced by environmental terrorists to
destroy business in America."
In a report issued earlier this
year, Defenders of Wildlife and the Natural Resources Defense Council denounced
ALEC as a vehicle for corporations to buy access to state legislatures -- often
with a little help from taxpayers, who in many states foot the travel bill for
legislators who attend ALEC meetings. The report found that the group's
corporate donors -- some of whom pay membership dues of $50,000 a year -- have
included Philip Morris, Amoco, Chevron, Enron, and the American Energy
Institute. ALEC enjoys what it calls an "impressive presence" among
the leadership of state legislatures, with a membership that includes speakers,
presidents, and majority and minority leaders in 22 senates and 30 houses. The
group's alumni also include nine governors and more than 80 members of
Congress, among them House Speaker Dennis Hastert and Majority Whip Tom DeLay.
The council wasn't always so dominated by business interests. Founded in 1973
by conservative activist Paul Weyrich and a handful of state legislators, ALEC
initially positioned itself as a counterweight to liberal foundations and think
tanks, focusing on social issues like abortion and the Equal Rights Amendment.
It wasn't until the late 1980s that ALEC shifted its emphasis to drawing up
bills that benefit industry. Now the group seeks to "espouse Jeffersonian,
free-market principles in the process of formulating innovative policy ideas
and solutions," says ALEC spokesman Joseph Rinzel.
What troubles critics of ALEC,
though, is the way those ideas are intentionally divorced from their source.
"People can push different ideas," says DeVries. "But the system
only works when we know who's behind them."